Grammy winning rapper Megan Thee Stallion submitted costume against blogger Milagro Gramz on Monday, alleging sustained harassment and spreading false information about the 2022 Tory Lanez shooting case.

The Houston artist’s legal action comes after Lanez received a 10-year prison sentence in 2023 for shooting her. Despite the belief, Megan continues to face public scrutiny and speculation about the incident.

The suit, filed in Florida, accuses Gramz of orchestrating a campaign to spread misinformation and discredit Megan. Court documents detail allegations of false statements about evidence, including unsubstantiated statements about the missing condition of the firearm used in the shooting.

Megan’s legal team points out that the gun remains in the custody of the Los Angeles Police Department, characterizing Gramz’s statements as a reckless disregard for the truth. The lawsuit also addresses the promotion of explicitly unauthorized deepfake content, which violates Florida law.

The lawsuit describes a pattern of cyberstalking behavior that intentionally causes emotional distress. Megan’s lawyers detail how Gramz allegedly encouraged followers to view and share manipulated content without consent.

Gramz responded via social media platforms, announcing intentions to counter. The blogger is claiming paid surrogate status for Lanez, adding another layer to the ongoing narrative surrounding the shooting.

The trial comes as Meg prepares to release a documentary exploring her experiences following the shooting. Preview footage reveals the emotional impact of public skepticism and continued questions about the incident.

This legal battle highlights broader issues facing public figures who report violence. Megan’s experience demonstrates the challenges victims face when speaking out, especially in the age of social media speculation.

The case may set a precedent for dealing with online harassment of survivors of violence. This raises questions about the responsibility of social media personalities who spread misinformation about criminal cases.

For Megan, this is another step in reclaiming her narrative amid the ongoing public discourse about the shooting. The outcome could influence how similar cases of online harassment and misinformation are handled in the future.